# The Gamma Family

You have seen in exercises that a non-negative random variable $X$ has the *gamma* $(r, \lambda)$ distribution for two positive parameters $r$ and $\lambda$ if the density of $X$ is given by

Here

is the *Gamma* function applied to $r$, and is part of the constant that makes the density integrate to 1.

As you have shown, the key fact about the Gamma function is the recursion

which implies in particular that

You have put all this together to show that

You have observed that the square of a standard normal variable has the gamma $(1/2, 1/2)$ distribution, and that the exponential $(\lambda)$ distribution is the same as the gamma $(1, \lambda)$ distribution.

### The Rate $\lambda$

For fixed $r$, the larger $\lambda$ is, the smaller $X$ is expected to be. Also like the exponential, the parameter $\lambda$ essentially identifies the units of measurement – for a positive constant $c$, the random variable $Y = cX$ has the gamma $(r, \lambda/c)$ distribution. You can see this by applying the linear change of variable formula for densities. For positive $y$, the density of $Y$ is

SciPy calls $1/\lambda$ the “scale” parameter of the gamma distribution. Because the parameter just determines the scale on the horizontal axis of the graph of the density, it is often taken to be 1. That’s what we will do to study the other parameter $r$.

### The Shape Parameter $r$

Here are the graphs of the gamma $(r, 1)$ densities for $r = 1$, $1.5$, and 2.

When $r = 1$ the density is exponential. As $r$ gets larger the density moves to the right and flattens out, consistent with the increasing mean $r$ and SD $\sqrt{r}$.

When $r = 10$, the gamma density looks almost normal. To see why, we will examine sums of independent gamma variables.

### Sums of Independent Gamma Variables with the Same Rate

**If $X$ has the gamma $(r, \lambda)$ distribution and $Y$ independent of $X$ has the gamma $(s, \lambda)$ distribution, then $X+Y$ has the gamma $(r+s, \lambda)$ distribution.**

Note that for the result to apply, the rate parameter has to be the same for $X$ and $Y$. The rate parameter turns out to be the same for $X+Y$ as well, and the shape parameters add up.

We will prove this result in the next chapter along with the corresponding result for sums of independent normal variables. For now, let’s test out the result by simulation just as we did with the sums of normals. The first three lines in the cell below set the values of $\lambda$, $r$, and $s$. The rest simulates 10000 values of $X+Y$ and plots the gamma $(r+s, \lambda)$ density over the simulated values.

```
# Change these three parameters as you wish.
lam = 1
r = 3
s = 7
# Leave the rest of the code alone.
x = stats.gamma.rvs(r, scale=1/lam, size=10000)
y = stats.gamma.rvs(s, scale=1/lam, size=10000)
w = x+y
Table().with_column('X+Y', w).hist(bins=20)
t = np.arange(min(w), max(w)+0.1, (max(w) - min(w))/100)
dens = stats.gamma.pdf(t, r+s, scale=1/lam)
plt.plot(t, dens, color='red', lw=2, label='gamma $(r+s, \lambda)$')
plt.legend()
plt.title('$X$ is gamma$(r, \lambda)$; $Y$ is gamma$(s, \lambda)$ independent of $X$');
```

You can now see why the gamma $(r, \lambda)$ distribution is approximately normal for large $r$. By the result above, for integer $r$ the sum of $r$ i.i.d. exponential $(\lambda)$ random variables has the gamma $(r, \lambda)$ distribution. For fixed $\lambda$ and increasing $r$, the Central Limit Theorem says the distribution of the sum tends to the normal.

The gamma family is used for modeling right-skewed distributions of non-negative variables. In data science, the gamma family also appears in the context of squaring i.i.d. “centered” normal random variables, that is, normal random variables with mean 0. The next section sets out the details.