# Chernoff Bound

If the form of a distribution is intractable in that it is difficult to find exact probabilities by integration, then good estimates and bounds become important. Bounds on the tails of the distribution of a random variable help us quantify roughly how close to the mean the random variable is likely to be.

We already know two such bounds. Let $X$ be a random variable with expectation $\mu$ and SD $\sigma$.

#### Markov’s Bound on the Right Hand Tail

If $X$ is non-negative,

#### Chebychev’s Bound on Two Tails

Moment generating functions can help us improve upon these bounds in many cases. In what follows, we will assume that the moment generating function of $X$ is finite over the whole real line. If it is finite only over a smaller interval around 0, the calculations of the mgf below should be confined to that interval.

### Chernoff Bound on the Right Tail

Observe that if $g$ is an increasing function, then the event ${ X \ge c }$ is the same as the event ${ g(X) \ge g(c)}$.

For any fixed $t > 0$, the function defined by $g(x) = e^{tx}$ is increasing as well as non-negative. So for each $t > 0$,

This is the first step in developing a Chernoff bound on the right hand tail.

For the next step, notice that you can choose $t$ to be any positive number. Some choices of $t$ will give sharper bounds than others. Because these are upper bounds, the sharpest among all of the bounds will correspond to the value of $t$ that minimizes the right hand side. So the Chernoff bound has an *optimized* form:

### Application to the Normal Distribution

Suppose $X$ has the normal $(\mu, \sigma^2)$ distribution and we want to get a sense of how far $X$ can be above the mean. Fix $c > 0$. The exact chance that the value of $X$ is at least $c$ above the mean is

because the distribution of $X - \mu$ is normal $(0, \sigma^2)$. This exact answer looks neat and tidy, but the standard normal cdf $\Phi$ is not easy to work with analytically. Sometimes we can gain more insight from a good bound.

The optimized Chernoff bound is

The curve below is the graph of $\exp(-ct + \sigma^2t^2/2)$ as a function of $t$, in the case $\sigma = 2$ and $c = 5$. The flat line is the exact probability of $P(X - \mu \ge c)$. The curve is always above the flat line: no matter what $t$ is, the bound is an upper bound. The sharpest of all the upper bounds corresponds to the minimizing value $t^*$ which is somewhere in the 1.2 to 1.3 range.

To find the minimizing value of $t$ analytically, we will use the standard calculus method of minimization. But first we will simplify our calculations by observing that finding the point at which a positive function is minimized is the same as finding the point at which the log of the function is minimized. This is because $\log$ is an increasing function.

So the problem reduces to finding the value of $t$ that minimizes the function $h(t) = -ct + \sigma^2t^2/2$. By differentiation, the minimizing value of $t$ solves

and hence

So the Chernoff bound is

Compare this with the bounds we already have. Markov’s bound can’t be applied directly as $X - \mu$ can have negative values. Because the distribution of $X - \mu$ is symmetric about 0, Chebychev’s bound becomes

When $c$ is large, the optimized Chernoff bound is quite a bit sharper than Chebychev’s. In the case $\sigma = 2$, the graph below shows the exact value of $P(X - \mu \ge c)$ as a function of $c$, along with the Chernoff and Chebychev bounds.

### Chernoff Bound on the Left Tail

By an analogous argument we can derive a Chernoff bound on the left tail of a distribution. For a fixed $t > 0$, the function $g(x) = e^{-tx}$ is decreasing and non-negative. So for $t > 0$ and any fixed $c$,

and therefore

### Sums of Independent Random Variables

The Chernoff bound is often applied to sums of independent random variables. Let $X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n$ be independent and let $S_n = X_1 + X_2 + \ldots + X_n$. Fix any number $c$. For every $t > 0$,

This result is useful for finding bounds on binomial tails because the moment generating function of a Bernoulli random variable has a straightforward form. It is also used for bounding tails of sums of independent indicators with possibly different success probabilities. We will leave all this for a subsequent course.